Size up the field capture and as-built drafting needed to document a structure that is already standing, whether the drawings are for legalizing unpermitted work, designing an addition, or replacing plans nobody can find.
Nothing here is a quote, a bid, an engineering determination or a boundary determination. We are a drafting and design firm: we coordinate with a licensed structural engineer and a Licensed Land Surveyor when your project needs one, rather than performing or stamping that work ourselves.
People tend to price as-builts as if the drafting were the job. It rarely is. The costly half is proving what exists: every room and opening measured, structure located, ceiling heights checked room by room because they are seldom consistent, walls found where they actually sit rather than where a plan from 1968 claims they sit, and the whole thing reconciled until the geometry closes.
That is why the state of your existing paperwork moves the number so much. Accurate permitted drawings hand you a starting geometry that only has to be confirmed, which beats measuring a building cold. Partial or outdated drawings are the difficult middle case: useful, and still no substitute for re-checking every number, because nothing tells you which parts got built the way they were drawn. Starting from nothing means every number is taken fresh.
Access is the multiplier nobody budgets for. A vacant building gets measured in one uninterrupted pass. An occupied one means working around furniture, packed closets and somebody else’s calendar, often across more than one visit. Crawlspaces, shallow attics and rooms that stay locked add hours, and sometimes a return trip once the framing question nobody could answer on the first day finally gets opened up.
A conventional hand measure-up is exactly what it sounds like: laser distance meter, sketch pad, room by room, opening by opening. On a single room, a garage, or a house whose original permitted plans are accurate and only need confirming, it is the cheaper option and there is no reason to pay for anything else. A Matterport 3D scan instead captures the whole space as measured point-cloud data in one pass on site, usually well under an hour for a normal house, and the drawings then get built against that data rather than against field notes.
The trade is straightforward. The scan costs more on the day, because the equipment and the processing are real costs a tape measure does not carry. It pays that back on exactly the projects where hand measuring is slow and error-prone: complex or irregular layouts, three-story buildings, work that was built without permits and matches nothing on file, and any space where a wrong dimension will stay hidden until the framing is already up. It also means the entire space was recorded, not only the dimensions somebody thought to write down, so the question that surfaces two weeks later can usually be answered without driving back.
For a straightforward, well-documented space the two methods land close enough that the hand measure-up wins on price. For an undocumented or unpermitted layout — the situation behind most red tag and code violation work — the scan usually costs less by the time the project closes, because the second site visit never has to happen.
When the drawings exist to legalize unpermitted work, they are the base of a bigger submittal rather than the submittal itself. Legalization scopes usually also want a Title 24 CF1R covering whatever conditioned space is involved, and wherever beams, framing, bearing walls or foundations got touched, the evaluation and the seal on that portion have to come from an independently licensed engineer. Drawing the package and bringing that engineer in is our side of it. Engineering is not something we perform or stamp, and nothing in this process decides how the department will rule.
Assume the reviewer will ask something the as-builts cannot answer on their own. Framing that was buried without inspection often has to be reopened so an inspector can look at it, and exploratory demolition on a legalization job is routine rather than a sign of trouble. Scheduling it in from the start is what keeps it from wrecking the timeline halfway through.
For an addition or a remodel the reasoning is the same even though the goal is different: accurate as-builts are what let the new design start from the building that exists instead of the building somebody remembers. One wrong dimension in the base file travels through the entire permit set and generally shows up mid-construction, which is the most expensive moment to discover it.
A hand measure-up on a typical single-family house runs a half day to a full day on site; a Matterport scan of the same house is usually under an hour. Turning either into a coordinated drawing set is generally one to two weeks depending on size, stories and how much needs verifying, and the estimator prints an indicative business-day range for whatever combination you selected. Difficult access or a return trip stretches both ends.
It depends on the building. On a small, simple, well-documented space, a hand measure-up is cheaper and entirely adequate. On a complex or unpermitted layout, a three-story building, or anywhere the existing drawings disagree with what is standing, the scan normally costs less overall, because it records the whole space in one pass and removes the second visit those projects otherwise tend to need. The estimator prices both so you can compare instead of guess.
Usually yes, though the job is smaller. Original drawings show what was approved, which is not the same as what was built, and decades of subsequent remodeling almost never made it back onto the record set. Confirming an existing plan costs less than measuring from scratch, which is why having them lowers the estimate rather than removing the line item.
No. They document the existing condition, which is where the submittal starts, but a legalization package normally also wants a full permit set, a CF1R covering whatever conditioned space is involved, and sealed structural documents wherever framing or foundations got touched. We draw the package and bring in a licensed engineer wherever a seal is needed. Whether the department accepts the package is the department's call, not ours.
Yes. The field capture visit is broken out as its own line, priced for whichever method you chose, because it is a distinct piece of work with a cost separate from the drafting. Multi-story buildings, difficult access and occupied properties all raise that visit toward its upper bound, and on a hand measure-up they sometimes force a second trip.
Yes, where the project warrants it. The scan produces a navigable 3D record of the space alongside the drawings, which is useful to a contractor pricing the work, an insurer documenting a condition, or anyone who needs to revisit the space without driving to it. It is a record of existing conditions, not a survey: property boundaries and elevation determinations require a Licensed Land Surveyor, whom we coordinate rather than replace.
Residential or commercial, drafting or Title 24 — send a few details and we'll follow up with next steps and a free quote.
(408) 676-8747
Sunny Drafting